based only on the inormation given in the diagram, which congruence theorems or postulates could be the given as reasons why abc=def

1. HA cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have an acute angle common in both the triangles.

2. HL can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as the triangles are right triangle with equal legs and hypotenuse.

3. SAS can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as there are  two congruent sides in both triangles and included angles ∠A=∠D=90° [right angle].

4. LA cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have an acute angle common in both the triangles.

5. AAS  cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have two angles common in both the triangles.

6.SSS can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is shown that all the sides of one triangle is congruent to the other.

1. HA cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have an acute angle common in both the triangles.

2. HL can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as the triangles are right triangle with equal legs and hypotenuse.

3. SAS can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as there are  two congruent sides in both triangles and included angles ∠A=∠D=90° [right angle].

4. LA cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have an acute angle common in both the triangles.

5. AAS  cannot be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is not given that they have two angles common in both the triangles.

6.SSS can be a reason to show given triangles are congruent as it is shown that all the sides of one triangle is congruent to the other.

HOPE THIS HELPS