![sadsociety41](/avatars/33849.jpg)
sadsociety41
01.10.2019 •
Physics
In general, court in the united states have repeatedly struck down efforts to include creationism or intelligent design in public school classroom. why?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Napoleon Cake: A Step-by-Step Guide...
- H Health and Medicine How to Increase Hemoglobin in the Blood...
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Chebureki: A Delicious Recipe for Russian Street Food...
- S Style and Beauty Ultimate Guide on How to Care for Suede Shoes...
- T Travel and tourism How to Use a Compass: A Beginner s Guide...
- D Dating, Love, Relationships Does a Person s Character Depend on the Color of Their Eyes?...
- F Food and Cooking Is it Really Possible to Cook Tasty Colored Cauliflower?...
- H Health and Medicine Why do our Joints Crack?...
- H Health and Medicine These Food Additives Can Do Significant Harm to Your Health...
- F Food and Cooking How to Choose the Right Olive Oil: A Comprehensive Guide...
Answers on questions: Physics
- P Physics Which of the following plant - based products are considered met analogs?...
- P Physics What is the speed of a motor scooter that can travel 7000ft in 1.5 hrs? Give the answer in miles per hour....
- M Mathematics Can someone help me on this...
- H History How did the railroads deal with rapidly moving trains across the United States and differences in times ?...
- C Chemistry A wet clay brick measuring 2 * 4 * 6 inches has an initial water content uniform 12% by weight. At time t = 0, the brick is exposed on all sides to air so that the...
- M Mathematics Calculate the area of the triangle below....
Ответ:
that's conducted in accordance with the Scientific Method.
You may say:
"Well then, teach both lines of reasoning,
and let each student decide for himself."
This is suggested by the same people who aren't ready to let their
fourth-grader choose his own clothing, dinner menu, or school.
And it sounds reasonable to a vast mass of citizens who have decided
for them selves that the jury is still out on climate change.
What I'm saying is this:
-- The Scientific Method is a METHOD of investigation that's designed
and developed to remove the effects of human prejudice from the
collection and evaluation of evidence, and to be able to tell bogus
conclusions apart from true ones. It's the most reliable way we have
of asking and answering questions about the natural world.
-- Some questions CAN'T be studied with the Scientific Method,
because experiments generally can't be constructed. These include
matters of religion and faith. Nobody can flatly state that those are
right or wrong. We have no reliable way to say, either way.
The only way to decide is . . . faith.
-- It is illegitimate to take the answer to a question of faith that can't be
derived scientifically, and a scientifically derived conclusion, set them
down next to each other on the same table, and pretend that they can be
compared.
-- When you put them next to each other, say that they're equivalent,
and tell people "go ahead and choose one or the other", the situation
is bogus, the comparison is dishonest, and people who are untrained
or uneducated or immature are not qualified to "choose".
That's why.
This is my opinion. I could be wrong.
Personally, I happen to be a believer. But I cannot prove anything I believe
to anyone else ... not with rational argument, and not with evidence. Those are
elements of the scientific method. They're not applicable, and they don't work,
in matters of faith.
Ответ:
A
Explanation:
la mejor distribución de alimentos