![tydendf10](/avatars/17612.jpg)
tydendf10
20.12.2019 •
Social Studies
Maviyane-davies believes that design is a powerful tool for social change. his last fourteen years in zimbabwe saw a consistent loss of freedom and none of the economic improvement promised by the government of president robert mugabe. he originally produced the human rights series at his own expense, but it was eventually adopted by the
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking How to Properly Collect Mushrooms? A Comprehensive Guide...
- C Computers and Internet 3D Glasses! What is this thing?...
- C Computers and Internet How to insert videos into LiveJournal?...
- C Computers and Internet How Much Does an iPhone Cost in America?...
- F Family and Home How to Choose the Best Diapers for Your Baby?...
- F Family and Home Parquet or laminate, which is better?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Properly Wind Fishing Line onto a Reel?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Make a Paper Boat in Simple Steps...
- T Travel and tourism Maldives Adventures: What is the Best Season to Visit the Luxurious Beaches?...
- H Health and Medicine Kinesiology: What is it and How Does it Work?...
Ответ:
United Nations
Explanation:
Maviyane-Davies was dubbed the guerrilla of graphic designing. He was fond of creating posters with hopeful messages.
These images created cross-cultural acceptance. The tenure of Mugabe did not see much freedom or hope with unfulfilled economic plans and his human right series was then accepted by the United Nations.
Ответ:
D) cruel and unusual punishment
Explanation:
In the case of Furman v. Georgia (1972) the Supreme Court was forced to review the application of the death penalty, in that at a few other cases.
Furman, an armed burglar trying to escape from the scene of a crime, fell, causing his gun to fire and kill a victim. The court considered the facts of this case and two similar cases in the Furman decision.
The following is an excerpt from their ruling statement:
“the Court holds that the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in these cases constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The judgment in each case is therefore reversed insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death sentence imposed, and the cases are remanded for further proceedings.”