![dontap3037](/avatars/6205.jpg)
dontap3037
01.10.2019 •
Social Studies
Which goals in the preamble have we achieved and why? which goals in the preamble have we not yet achieved and why?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Society and Politics What Would Brezhnev Do If He Were Alive Today?...
- S Style and Beauty Choosing a Hair Straightener: Specific Criteria to Consider...
- F Family and Home How to Remove Tar Stains: Tips and Recommendations from Experts...
- F Family and Home How to Remove Fading from Clothes: Tips and Tricks...
- S Sport How to Do a Jumping Split...
- H Health and Medicine How Did Inna Lose Weight on Dom 2?...
- F Family and Home How to Properly Fold Napkins in a Napkin Holder?...
- F Food and Cooking How to Set Up Ventrilo - The Ultimate Guide...
- S Science and Technology How to Make a Homemade Smoker: The Ultimate Guide...
- A Auto and Moto Battle for the Relocation of The Cherkizovsky Market: Who Won?...
Answers on questions: Social Studies
- A Arts (GIVING BRAINILLEST) Write a short paragraph Were there any downsides to Motown’s success? Provide details about how Berry Gordy’s strategy for mainstream success was difficult...
- A Arts If an artist wanted to create an image of a bright moon in the night sky using mezzotint, he or she should smooth the burrs on the surface of the plate for the area of the...
- E English Mary down because her temperature had...
Ответ:
answer:
although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the federal government,1 the supreme court has often referred to it as evidence of the origin, scope, and purpose of the constitution.2 “its true office,” wrote joseph story in his commentaries, “is to expound the nature and extent and application of the powers actually conferred by the constitution, and not substantively to create them. for example, the preamble declares one object to be, ‘provide for the common defense.’ no one can doubt that this does not enlarge the powers of congress to pass any measures which they deem useful for the common defence. but suppose the terms of a given power admit of two constructions, the one more restrictive, the other more liberal, and each of them is consistent with the words, but is, and ought to be, governed by the intent of the power; if one could promote and the other defeat the common defence, ought not the former, upon the soundest principles of interpretation, to be adopted? ”3
explanation:
Ответ:
sorry i can't do this
Explanation: