Planets and moons shine in the sky due to reflected sunlight TRUE or FALSE
NO SITES PLEASE
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Cottage Cheese Casserole? A Proven Recipe...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Solve a Rubik s Cube Easily and Quickly...
- H Health and Medicine Want to Lose Weight? Gain Muscle without Damaging Your Health!...
- F Family and Home Parquet or laminate, which is better?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Properly Wind Fishing Line onto a Reel?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Make a Paper Boat in Simple Steps...
- T Travel and tourism Maldives Adventures: What is the Best Season to Visit the Luxurious Beaches?...
- H Health and Medicine Kinesiology: What is it and How Does it Work?...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
Answers on questions: Biology
- B Biology Heavier female black bears produce more offspring. Which statement describes a genetic factor that might negatively affect a female black bear s reproductive success...
- M Mathematics Show all work to solve the equation for x. If a solution is extraneous, be sure to identify it. Square root of the quantity x + 6 end quantity - 4 = x....
- B Business The most common reason a person is denied a lone is...
- M Mathematics Kris is setting up tables for an awards banquet. Each table seats 16 people. What is the fewest number of tablesKris needs to set up for 132 people?...
Ответ:
its true but internet should tell you that in a short amount of time
Ответ:
This question has created a stir among conservation biologists and ecologists that has lasted for 15 years. New insights into the debate are critically reviewed in an editorial by the editors of the international scientific journal Biological Conservation, and a separate article in the same journal. The evidence affects the core tenets of conservation biology: How do humans influence biodiversity? And how do we set and measure conservation goals?
Many recent ecological studies have found the surprising result that the number of species (i.e., species richness) at sites around the world has remained stable on average or is even increasing. These sites include wide range of species and habitats-plants and animals; and forests, grasslands, freshwaters, and oceans.
"These findings highlight the need for conservation biologists to avoid oversimplification when making the case for conservation and selecting indicators of success," says Dr. Richard Primack, lead author of the editorial and an editor at Biological Conservation. "'More species is good' is a seductively straightforward and attractive argument. However, it ignores scale (biodiversity can increase locally, but decline globally), it ignores ecological processes and interactions, and it ignores many other aspects of biodiversity-such as changes in ecosystem services and loss of genetic variation-less obvious to non-biologists. It also misses the ethical, cultural, and aesthetic values of certain species and ecological communities, such as monarch butterflies and redwood forests. These aspects of biodiversity can still be damaged or lost, even as species richness remains steady or increases."
Some ecologists argue that the trends should not be considered as true "global" patterns of changes in local biodiversity. The reason is that the studies exclude sites that were paved, turned to farmland, or recovering from past disturbance (e.g., abandoned farmland returning to forests), and include sites that are not evenly distributed around the world. These ecologists argue that a fair analysis would conclude that biodiversity is generally declining both globally and locally.