Which of the following pieces of text evidence best captures the author's thesis in "Shakespeare and Samurai (and Robot Ninjas?)"?

Well the question is what did the child did? What crime did that child commit and how out of control is he or she?. I’m my personal opinion I would say yes, because a 12 year old child would be Abel to make decisions on their own. If a child of that age stole a candy, then no. But if a child commit a crime such as murder or not cooperating with the parent or guardian.