![Larkinlover703](/avatars/16990.jpg)
Larkinlover703
27.09.2019 •
History
Draw conclusions why was a bill of rights not
included in the original constitution? why might the
anti-federalists have wanted a bill of rights in the
document?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking How many stages of coffee roasting are there?...
- G Goods and services Kogda zhdatt Iphone 5? The Latest News and Rumors...
- F Family and Home Parquet or laminate, which is better?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Properly Wind Fishing Line onto a Reel?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Make a Paper Boat in Simple Steps...
- T Travel and tourism Maldives Adventures: What is the Best Season to Visit the Luxurious Beaches?...
- H Health and Medicine Kinesiology: What is it and How Does it Work?...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
- S Style and Beauty Intimate Haircut: The Reasons, Popularity, and Risks...
Answers on questions: History
- H History What effect did the battle of tannenberg have on the war?...
- M Mathematics I DONT clearly understand.....
- B Business Torque engine company is considering opening a plant in china. it will cost $3,500,000 to set up the plant and $800,000 to train employees. an additional $160,000 will be spent to...
Ответ:
answer: federalists argued that the constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. anti-federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
explanation:
Ответ:
A.
decreased as a result of US government legislation.