parkbro3956
28.11.2019 •
History
Has american foreign policy become more or less difficult since the fall of the soviet union? support your position with facts
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- C Computers and Internet Dropbox: What is it and How to Use it...
- H Health and Medicine How to Increase Hemoglobin in the Blood...
- A Animals and plants How to Store Carrots: Tips for Homeowners...
- L Legal consultation Juvenile Justice: Who Needs It?...
- F Family and Home How to Choose the Best Diapers for Your Baby?...
- F Family and Home Parquet or laminate, which is better?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Properly Wind Fishing Line onto a Reel?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Make a Paper Boat in Simple Steps...
- T Travel and tourism Maldives Adventures: What is the Best Season to Visit the Luxurious Beaches?...
- H Health and Medicine Kinesiology: What is it and How Does it Work?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History What did delegates request of king george...
- H History What evidence would offer proof for the different theo the origins of the Indo-Aryans?...
- S Social Studies Assume that bieber himself took this selfie on his phone. who owns the copyright to this picture? a. no one does because a selfie is not sufficiently creative or...
Ответ:
The American foreign policy becomes less difficult since the fall of the Soviet Union (USSR)
Explanation:
The American foreign policy becomes less difficult and more corrupt in terms of the earlier policies. There is a violation of norms in this regard. For example, the nation refused to ratify several important international treaties such as the International Criminal Court of Rome Statute, the Treaty on Law of the Treaty of Vienna, and the US Convention on Human Rights; Did not attend the anti-personal mine ban convention; And conducts regular drone strikes and cruise missile attacks worldwide.
Sometimes the American exceptionalism related with hypocrisy; For example, the America Nuclear holds a large stock of weapons while the country requests other nations to not to have such explosions.
Ответ:
Explanation:
well it is both, its all on your perspective. on the one hand, the poor fool who bought the painting lost 1.4 million dollars, so in his eyes it was vandalism. However it was also art because first of all his art was his so he had a right to destroy it. and he also destroyed it in a way that was spectacular and beautiful, and tragic. and now all of the sudden its a new art piece, this one sadder.