![trietvo112200](/avatars/8952.jpg)
trietvo112200
23.07.2019 •
History
The two publishers who transformed the daily newspaper into a form of entertainment were their newspapers included many sensational stories, sports, comics, and news about entertainment. ( 10-points for both answer (20 pts) (brainliest, , and ratings also.)
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Family and Home Parquet or laminate, which is better?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Properly Wind Fishing Line onto a Reel?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Make a Paper Boat in Simple Steps...
- T Travel and tourism Maldives Adventures: What is the Best Season to Visit the Luxurious Beaches?...
- H Health and Medicine Kinesiology: What is it and How Does it Work?...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
- S Style and Beauty Intimate Haircut: The Reasons, Popularity, and Risks...
- A Art and Culture When Will Eurovision 2011 Take Place?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Choose the Perfect Hair Straightener?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History What was it called when the Japanese killed over 10,000 men by forcing captured American and philippine troops to walk over 65 miles with no food or water?...
- H History Revolutionary America:Question 7 The Declaration of Independence was written to make the colonies independent of which nation? Select one Spain o Ireland France Britain...
- H History A theater company has raised $930.75 by selling 25 floor seat tickets. Each ticket costs the same. Part A: Write an equation with a variable that can be solved to...
- H History Please give me an accurate answer.Only answer if you re very good at History.Please don t put a link to a website. Why did the people of Georgia view the Cherokee...
- H History Where were most of Europe s colonies by the end of the nineteenth century? A. North America B. South Pacific C. South America D. Asia E. Africa...
- H History In the presidential campaign of 1860, politicians and editors across the South associated the ___ Party with abolitionist John Brown, and warned that this party s...
- H History Revolutionary America:Question 8 Which of the following are things that happens in a REPRESENTATIVE democracy? Choose all that apply: citizens get to vote for what...
- H History In just one day, during the battle of open area more than 20.000 men were killed as the british advanced across an open area...
- H History What was the main reason for the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882? A) Preventing the depletion of natural resources B) Discouraging anti-American activism C) Reducing...
- H History Chester Nimitz would had the MOST impact in World War II in which general area on the map? A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) 4...
Ответ:
Ответ:
Big Stick policy was President Rosevelt's mechanism to handle foreign policy. He aimed to think carefully before, but to exercise sudden and relentless action, before any kind of crisis could emerge.
Roosevelt's corollary was an extension of the prior Monroe doctrine, and desgined after the Venezuelan crisis of 1902-1903. It stated that the US would intervene in Latin American countries that were under its influence, to ensure that the rights of US citizens and enterprises were guaranteed there. In such cases the US would intervene to restore the lost rights, exercising the so-called new imperalism. Of course, this was embodied in the big stick diplomacy.
In turn, the previous Monroe Doctrine firmly stated the opposition to European imperalism in the whole American continent since 1823. Any act commited by a European country, which reflected an intention of controlling a state both in North or South America, would be considered a direct offence against the US, and the corresponding retaliation would be executed.
If I were an American at the time of Roosevelt's Corollary I would have probably supported it, as it brought entrepeneurship opportunities for US citizens in Latin American countries, under the protection of the US government. On the other hand, if I was a Cuban in 1900s I would not have supported it, as that corollary meant that most of the power in some Latin American countries started to be controlled by the US, instead of emerging from the citizens of the country and being exercised by the representatives they had voted through suffrage. It meant a new, more tacit form of imperialism which made the US hypocrite.