![kellysmith45](/avatars/23460.jpg)
kellysmith45
05.05.2020 •
History
What actions were taken as "clear indicators" of U.S. post war position? (Nokilov Telegram)
Rapid expanse of a peacetime army to 1 million people
Creation of a system of naval and air bases in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans
Limiting Soviet influence in neighboring countries
All of these actions were seen as examples
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Cottage Cheese Casserole? A Proven Recipe...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Solve a Rubik s Cube Easily and Quickly...
- H Health and Medicine Want to Lose Weight? Gain Muscle without Damaging Your Health!...
- F Family and Home Parquet or laminate, which is better?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Properly Wind Fishing Line onto a Reel?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Make a Paper Boat in Simple Steps...
- T Travel and tourism Maldives Adventures: What is the Best Season to Visit the Luxurious Beaches?...
- H Health and Medicine Kinesiology: What is it and How Does it Work?...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History Days when the suns light hits both hemispheres equally are called?...
- H History This was the portion of the trans-atlantic trade were slaves were brought from africa to the americas on a brutal, grueling journey....
- H History Which word describes the lifestyle that the first english settlers of america lived? rushed cultivated harsh constrained...
- H History What made japan an ideal place for industrialization?...
- H History List three things the national confederation could do...
- H History Why does tinker v. des moines remain an important precedent-setting case? it protected all symbolic speech in war protests. it applied prior restraint in schools. it established speech...
- H History The mississippians were considered to be horticulturalists, which means they were a) native americans. b) hostile to non-mississippians. c) people who relied on hunting and gathering....
- H History What impact did the caliphs have on the spread of islam? the caliphs’ rule kept islam limited to the arabian peninsula. the clans’ conflict over the caliphs’ control restricted the...
- H History In furman v. georgia (1972), william furman appealed his death sentence for domestic violence. murder. drunk driving. assault....
- H History Who perfected the lightbulb and helped harness electricity?...
Ответ:
Hello There Again. The correct answer C. Limiting Soviet influence in neighboring countries.
Explanation:
Because of The Russian Russia had ever
known before. This achievement and its ensuing results led to the emergence
of the Soviet Union as a military superpower. In this capacity, the Soviet
Union was able to project its power to a degree unparalleled in Russian
history-a transformation with immense potential. This broad view focused
the examination of the symposium’s various topics and themes, orally in
presentations and discussions, and then more fully in the essays of this
volume, composed prior to the symposium and refiied in its wake.
All historical records are incomplete and these proceedings are an
imperfect record. The introductions and commentaries exhibit some discontinuities because their authors did not see the revised versions of the papers
contained in this volume. The members of the inti~~ti~nal panelwhich
closed the symposium commented only briefly because of time limitations,
but subsequently submitted the written observations in this volume. Discussions with the audience at the symposium’s sessions and the banquet presentation by Brig. Gen. Roland Lajoie, USA, on “The Soviet Fignting Man” are
not included here because of space limitations. They must remain the special
pleasure, benefit, and memory of the symposium’s participants.
What distinguishes this book from others in Soviet studies and Russian
military history? In Soviet studies a plethora of books and articles on military issues exists in a contemporary framework from the vantage points of
national security and international relations. Very few are written in the historical perspective. In Western writing on Russian military history, the
number of historians and uniformed specialists recognized as truly outstanding is surprisingly limited- fact which became forcefully evident to
the symposium’s organizers as they combed Germany, France, Great Britain,
and the United Stam for qualified contributors. This volume views the subject historically and may be unique in its combination of overall program,
individual connibutions, and suggestions for future research. In the structure
of its program it is a survey of modern Russian military history. In its individual contributions it provides a good bit of specialized “post-holing.” It
possesses a pragmatic, professional military view in having sought out contributions by qualified military contributors and in providing a bibliographical aid. This aid is a significant indicator of the current professional
level of Soviet military studies in the West, offering military specialists,
scholars, and graduate students a readily accessible tool for further research
and study. The Great Patriotic War demonstrated both capabilities and deficiencies
in Soviet society, many still unexplored by Western specialists. The ability
of the Soviet Union to sustain itself in the face of extraordmxy losses and
destruction is indisputable. Why this was true is less cIear. It may be that
this was the major contribution of the Communist Party, but the issue remains
unestablished, at least in Western minds. This question is related to one of
the symposium’s major gaps, the question of the role of the “rear” or the
“homefront” in Russian wars and in particular in World War II. The poverty
of Westem scholarship on the Russian and Soviet ‘‘mar’’ caused planners for
the Academy’s 1982 military history symposium to leave out Russia and the
Soviet Union altogether at that symposium, which was devoted to the subject. Hope it helps!
Ответ:
£116.67
Step-by-step explanation:
Given;
Nar donated to 4 charities last year. She gave £175 to each of these charities.
The total amount Nar donated is;
Nar = 4 × £175 = £700
For Rana to donate the same amount equally among 6 charity, to determine the amount each charity would receive this year, we need to divide the total amount by the number of charities;
A = £700/6
A = £116.67