adyenamaie02
05.12.2020 •
History
What important court case was decided during Jefferson's presidency that shifted interpretation of
the law from the states to the federal Judicial Branch?
A- Marbury v Madison
B- Gideon v Wainwright
C- Miranda v Arizona
D- Roe v Wade
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Style and Beauty Ultimate Guide on How to Care for Suede Shoes...
- S Sport Running: How to Do It Right?...
- F Food and Cooking How to Cook Spaghetti Right – Secrets and Tips...
- P Philosophy Personal attitude towards Confession: how to prepare and undergo the procedure correctly?...
- H Health and Medicine Flu: How to Recognize It by the First Symptoms?...
- F Food and Cooking How to Sober Up Quickly? Important Facts and Tips...
- H Health and Medicine How to Properly Take a Blood Sugar Test?...
- H Health and Medicine Simple and Effective: How to Get Rid of Cracked Heels...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History In a 2005 Supreme Court opinion, Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote, “It is proper that we acknowledge the overwhelming weight of international opinion against the...
- M Mathematics This table displays a scenario. a two column table with seven rows. the first column, gallons, g, has the entries, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. the second column, liters, l, has...
- M Mathematics If 3x= 27, then x = 9 what algebraic property?...
- M Mathematics PLEASE HELP FAST! will give brainiest Multiply: 1 0 1 x 1 -1 2 -1 3 x -1 2 3 4 What is the size of the resulting matrix?...
- C Chemistry An unknown compound with empirical formula c3h5 was treated with br2/ccl4. the bromine solution went from orangish/red to clear immediately at room temperature. upon...
- M Mathematics What is the volume of the regular pyramid below?...
Ответ:
In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, before police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with ra pe, kidna pping, and rob bery. Miranda was not informed of his rights before the police interrogation. During the two-hour interrogation, Miranda allegedly confessed to committing the crimes, which the police apparently recorded. Miranda, who had not finished ninth grade and had a history of mental instability, had no counsel present. At trial, the prosecution's case consisted solely of his confession. Miranda was convicted of both ra pe and kidnapping and sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison. He appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, claiming that the police had unconstitutionally obtained his confession. The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction. Miranda appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1966.
Explanation:
hope this help