![foralways3348](/avatars/3736.jpg)
foralways3348
14.01.2020 •
History
What was a significant provision of the northwest ordinance?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Sport How to wrap boxing hand wraps? Everything you need to know!...
- F Family and Home How to Sew Curtain Tapes: Best Tips from Professionals...
- A Animals and plants How to Grow Lime from a Seed: Simple Tips and Interesting Facts...
- C Computers and Internet How to Create a Folder on Your iPhone?...
- G Goods and services How to sew a ribbon: Tips for beginners...
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Mayonnaise at Home? Secrets of Homemade Mayonnaise...
- C Computers and Internet Which Phone is Best for Internet Surfing?...
- F Food and Cooking Everything You Need to Know About Pasta...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- H Horoscopes, Magic, Divination Where Did Tarot Cards Come From?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History Can someone plz help me it’s due rn...
- C Computers and Technology Why can’t a computer use source code 1.trick question but computers do use source code 2.source code is only available as a web app 3.source is legacy 4.source code...
- E English Of the different kinds of vocabularies, the one that s the largest is the vocabulary. a. recognition b. written c. oral d. casual...
- M Mathematics Which set is a proper subset of the counting numbers? {−1,0,1} {5} {0} {1,2,3,…}...
Ответ:
northwest america so is em is an l is an see an see if so is doing well i re an by see an if so did so we it was see by the is an du to date do to do it was a good day and time works for you and I'll make sure to get the net and I will be there right u uuy is the net and I will be there at the same time as the door
Ответ:
The politician’s argument does not be convincing because it confuses the term correlation with the causation.
Option D
Explanation:
It is logically not reasonable to link the two events (correlation and causation) as they are influenced by different cause and effect scenarios. If there is an increase in the taxes on banks, the effect should be protests by the banks as the banks and its workers.
Because the people who are working in the banks are the people who are affected by this action, not the robbers. The politician’s argument does not be convincing because it confuses the term correlation with the causation.