Sign In Sign Up Ask an AI advisor
sammimoose6490
sammimoose6490
02.02.2021 • 
Mathematics

An Analyst wants to know if there was a significance difference in the average of hours worked in a week from 2000 (Group 1) to 2008 (Group 2). He gathers all the data from the General Social Survey. (alpha = 0.05). The General Social Survey uses a method similar to simple random sampling. With a p-value equal to 0.8474, what conclusion would you make? Group of answer choices Given our p-value above, there is enough statistically significant evidence to say that there is a difference in the average wages worked in a week across the US from 2000 to 2008. We Reject the Alternative Hypothesis. Given our p-value above, there is only a small amount of evidence to say that there is a difference in the average wages worked in a week across the US from 2000 to 2008. We Fail to Reject the Null Hypothesis. Given our p-value above, there is NO statistically significant evidence to say that there is a difference in the average wages worked in a week across the US from 2000 to 2008. We Fail to Reject the Null Hypothesis. Given our p-value above, we can definitely say there is NOT evidence to say that there is a difference in the average wages worked in a week across the US 2000 to 2008. We Reject the Null Hypothesis.

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question

I want advice