According to PC 1111, to be an accomplice a person must have aided, promoted, encouraged, or instigated by act or advice the commission of an offense with of the of the person who committed the offense.

knowledge, unlawful purpose

Explanation:

According to PC 1111, to be an accomplice a person must have aided, promoted, encouraged, or instigated by act or advice the commission of an offense with knowledge, unlawful purpose of the of the person who committed the offense.

knowledge.

Explanation:

The PC 1111 refers to a law code which regards to definition of a particle law and the punishment for those that broke that law. This part of the law that is PC 1111 defines what an accomplice is. And as it is given in the question above, PC 1111; ''... to be an accomplice a person must have aided, promoted, encouraged, or instigated by act or advice the commission of an offense with KNOWLEDGE of the of the person who committed the offense''.

Note that the capitalized word is the missing word to be filled in the gap.

The key defenders for the school of structuralism were Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Bradford Titchener, while the persuasive figures who built up the school of functionalism were William James, G. Stanley Hall and James M. Cattell. Structuralists concentrated on "how" the psyche is organized, while functionalists dove in "why" and "how" the mind capacities.