The period in history when agricultural societies began to form is the paleolithic age ice age mesolithic age neolithic age
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Shortcrust Pastry: Recipe and Tips...
- H Horoscopes, Magic, Divination Is there a 13th Zodiac Sign?...
- H Health and Medicine Want to Lose Weight? Gain Muscle without Damaging Your Health!...
- F Family and Home Parquet or laminate, which is better?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Properly Wind Fishing Line onto a Reel?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Make a Paper Boat in Simple Steps...
- T Travel and tourism Maldives Adventures: What is the Best Season to Visit the Luxurious Beaches?...
- H Health and Medicine Kinesiology: What is it and How Does it Work?...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
Answers on questions: History
- E English The bonfire was by this time beginning to sink low, for the fuel had not been of that substantial sort which can support a blaze long. Most of the other fires within the wide...
- B Business Abena tells her partner Alex that she s going to run to the store for some bread. Alex asks why Abena doesn t just take the car. This misunderstanding was due to a(n) fallacy....
- P Physics How is direct current generated? How is it useful?...
Ответ:
Ответ:
Vacuous proof is used.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Proposition p(n) :
"if n is a positive integer greater than 1, then n² > n"
To prove:
Prove the proposition p (0)
Solution:
Using the proposition p(n) the proposition p(0) becomes:
p(0) = "if 0 is a positive integer greater than 1, then 0² > 0"
The proposition that "0 is a positive integer greater than 1" is false
Since the premises "if 0 is a positive integer greater than 1" is false this means the overall proposition/ statement is true.
Thus this is the vacuous proof which states that:
if a premise p ("0 is a positive integer greater than 1") is false then the implication or conditional statement p->q ("if n is a positive integer greater than 1, then n² > n") is trivially true.
So in vacuous proof, the implication i.e."if n is a positive integer greater than 1, then n2 > n." is only true when the antecedent i.e. "0 is a positive integer greater than 1" cannot be satisfied.