![moodycrunchbar](/avatars/9256.jpg)
moodycrunchbar
18.01.2020 •
History
Why were the writings of enlightenment philosophers important to history?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Style and Beauty Ultimate Guide on How to Care for Suede Shoes...
- S Sport Running: How to Do It Right?...
- F Food and Cooking How to Cook Spaghetti Right – Secrets and Tips...
- P Philosophy Personal attitude towards Confession: how to prepare and undergo the procedure correctly?...
- H Health and Medicine Flu: How to Recognize It by the First Symptoms?...
- F Food and Cooking How to Sober Up Quickly? Important Facts and Tips...
- H Health and Medicine How to Properly Take a Blood Sugar Test?...
- H Health and Medicine Simple and Effective: How to Get Rid of Cracked Heels...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History What was the most useful purpose of flint for early humans? starting fires carving cups making clothing constructing buildings...
- H History How were American politics and culture shaped by the Cold War? be sure to use subversion hydrogen bomb domino theory containment McCarthyism in your answer...
- H History Should New Jersey be considered the crossroads of the American Revolution? If so why?...
- H History Read the excerpt from an 1852 speech by italian statesman giuseppe mazzini on lombardy, a region of italy that was ruled by austria at the time. [lombardy] struggled, they still struggle...
- H History Visual art that evokes feelings of torment and pain is known...
- H History Which answer best describes why towns and cities were built around railroads and canals? the government and transportation companies planned to build the cities. the canals and railroads...
- H History WHICH OF THE STATEMENTS CHARACTERIZES AN ADVANTAGE AND DISADVANTAGE THE UNION HAD DURING THE CIVIL WAR?...
- H History In which ways did the Durbar of 1877 mark a change for India? In which ways did India’s situation remain the same?...
- H History Which of the following is not a type of evidence that a political scientist might employ? a. court decisions b. written laws and regulations c. group patterns found in families d....
- H History Which is an example of an electric force that occurs in atoms? a.) a proton attracts an neutron. b.) a proton repels an electron. c.) a proton attracts an electron....
Ответ:
Ответ:
The Holy Roman Empire, as an "empire", did not have a territory of its own. It must be understood in the context of feudalism: a number of princes/kings/bishops/whatever were tied, through sworn allegiance, to the elected Emperor. In a way, we can say that the Empire extended exactly as far as these constituent elements extended. On the other hand, the Emperor did not "own" these lands. In the vassal-suzerain relationship, the vassal owes support and a solid does of obedience, but is still the rightful owner of his lands (and in the feudal world, land ownership is merged with the judicial power). The Emperor could own some territories, not because he was Emperor, but through personal inheritance. The imperial crown did not come with a specific dedicated domain. This matters a lot from a strategic point of view: in Medieval times, the size of the army you could muster depended on your resources, i.e. the lands that you owned. The Emperor could, as the ultimate suzerain for all Empire territories, requests his vassals to provide for troops (that's what Frederick I did for the ill-fated Third Crusade), but in order to maintain order within the Empire (i.e. to keep his own vassals under his control), the Emperor had to rely on his own resources.
Explanation:
can i get brainllest